• Sec. Infra Overview
  • Past Audits
  • Code Structure
  • Centralization
  • Exposure to other Defi
  • Recommendation
  • User Rating
  • Back
protocol logo

Aave V3

Rating

A

Score73.00

Lending

Sec. Infrastructure Overview

Current Bug Bounty: Immunefi
Bug Bounty Max Payout: 1.0M $
Has paid White Hats before:
Date of Last Audit: 1 Jan 1

Recent Security Incidents

  • Incident

    Amount Lost

    Date

Secured By

The Protocol is secured by

  • Name

    Type

    Website

  • logo of list item
    0

Past Audits

Number of Audits

4

Number of Vul. Found

15

Date of Last Audit

1 Jan 1

Past Audit Reports

Last codebase change was on: 1 Jan 1

Show Code Locations
Show all Vulnerabilities

Vulnerabilities reported in past audits

Code Structure

Lines of Code

0

Amount of Contracts

295

External Integrations

0

Code Summery

The main purpose of the Aave application is to serve as a decentralized non-custodial liquidity protocol that enables users to lend and borrow assets. Users can participate as suppliers, providing liquidity to the market and earning interest, or as borrowers, who can access liquidity by offering collateral that exceeds the borrowed amount. The platform features a native stablecoin called GHO, which is integral to its operations. Aave.com also offers a variety of resources, including guides, FAQs, and technical documentation, to support both users and developers in navigating the protocol effectively. Additionally, the Aave Governance forum allows the community to engage in the governance process, ensuring that users have a say in the protocol' development and parameters.

Show Dependency Graph

Code Structure & Dependency

Show Codefile metrics

Centralization

Decentralization Score

15 out of 20

Contract Upgradability

No upgradability

Frontend

Go to Dapp

Maintenance Score

1.00

Poor

Excellent

Admin / Governance Functions

Timelocks

No Timelocks

Pauseability

Can be paused

Admin Wallet

0x6b8fcF12c960fA11048644BCC3c058b1d40D4Cc3

Aave DAO is used to govern the protocol.

Recommendations

Deficit is handled differently for GHO than for any other asset. An edge case is being introduced in which liquidating uint256.max would revert instead of liquidating max. Clearing the bad debt as a result of a liquidation increases the gas cost linearly with every additional debt asset. To keep gas costs under control, the bad debt cleanup will not clear the borrower’

User Rating

Avg. User Rating

No ratings

No ratings yet

Submit your review

Protocols on SCAS can't offer incentives to hide reviews

Disclaimer:

SCAS conducts security assessments on the provided source code exclusively. Conduct your own due diligence before deciding to use any info listed at this page.

In case you find any information on this report is incorrect, please fill out following form:Feedback